Senate Inquiry Into Gambling Advertising
- Senate Inquiry Into Gambling Advertising Board
- Senate Inquiry Into Gambling Advertising In India
- Senate Inquiry Into Gambling Advertising Act
- Senate Inquiry Into Gambling Advertising Examples
- Senate Inquiry Into Gambling Advertising Definition
SELECT COMMITTEE ON GAMBLING INQUIRY INTO THE IMPACT OF GAMBLING Supplementary questions: Gambling Treatment Clinic, University of Sydney. Senate’s attention is directed to the arguments used to ban tobacco and alcohol advertising on. Regulates and is the beneficiary of gambling, the Senate ought to be directing this question to the NSW. Gambling advertising has capitalised on the immediacy and easy access to gambling products. In the space of less than a minute, a person can receive a notification advertising or offering a gambling product and can act ont tha prompt without any time to reflect or consider the implications.
Posted March 29, 2017 19:54:25
Senate Inquiry Into Gambling Advertising Board
December 2011 Parliamentary Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform Second report Interactive and online gambling and gambling advertising Interactive Gambling. The Senate inquiry into loot boxes isn't due to report back until mid-September. Ahead of their deliberations, members of industry, academia and the public have made submissions to the panel. Nov 28, 2018 The Senate inquiry into 'gaming micro-transactions for chance-based items' - otherwise known as the loot box inquiry - has tabled its report to Parliament, recommending that the Federal Government undertake a 'comprehensive review of loot boxes in video games'.
If you are a parent who was hoping those incessant gambling ads would be banned during sporting broadcasts, and were pinning your hopes on senator Nick Xenophon's private member's bill to ban them — well, bad luck.
The bill has been all but killed off by a Senate Estimates Committee, with the Coalition and Labor recommending against the reforms.
The senator and his NXT party had proposed the ban, as well as the establishment of a national regulator and a national self-exclusion register for people struggling with a gambling habit.
Senator Xenophon's private bill is separate to the Federal Government's Interactive Gambling Amendment Bill, which was introduced last year after a review by former New South Wales premier Barry O'Farrell.
The Senate Committee concluded the measures were not necessary because of the Government's reforms.
Senator Xenophon 'vehemently rejects' the committee's recommendations, saying 'the current (regulatory) framework, even with the recent Government amendments, is woeful'.
NXT had a win last week when its amendment to the Government's bill, banning bookies from offering a line of credit, passed the Senate with the support of Labor, the Greens and crossbenchers.
But it now needs to go back to the House of Representatives where it is expected to fail.
And just last week, the Senate knocked back Senator Xenophon's attempt to insert some of his proposals into the Government's bill, including the ban on gambling ads, and the establishment of a national regulator.
Support groups' submissions
The Australian Psychological Society made a submission to the Senate inquiry, and said 'the proliferation of gambling advertising, particularly sports betting, is positioning gambling as an integral and 'normal' part of enjoying sports, and is paving the way for young Australians to become the new generation of problem gamblers'.
The Gambling Impact Society of NSW told the inquiry that gambling advertisements often created 'triggers' for those already struggling with gambling problems.
Broadcasters and sports-betting organisations argued against a ban, saying people under 18 'comprise a very small proportion of the audience for live sports events on television'.
They won the argument.
And with a bounty flowing to both, the betting ads do not look set to stop anytime soon.
Topics:gambling, sport, government-and-politics, community-and-society, federal-government, australia, adelaide-5000
The Interactive Gambling Act (IGA) was passed in June 2001 by the Australian Government with the purpose of protecting the Australian public from the detrimental effects of online gambling.
Senate Inquiry Into Gambling Advertising In India
The law[edit]
The Interactive Gambling Act (2001) was passed by the Parliament of Australia on 28 June 2001.[1] It received assent on 11 July 2001.[2]
The IGA is targeted at online gambling operators and makes it an offence for them to offer ‘real-money’ online interactive gambling to residents of Australia. It also makes it illegal for online gambling operators to advertise ‘real-money’ interactive gambling services (such as online poker and casino) to Australian citizens.[3]
Accessing and using the interactive gambling services is not an offence. It is also allowed to companies based in Australia to offer their gambling services to gamblers located outside Australia with the exception of those countries that were called 'designated countries'.[4] A country can be called designated upon request of the government of this country and on condition that there is corresponding legislation in this country.[5]
Offense
- The law applies to all interactive gambling operators whether they are Australian or foreign owned or whether they are based in Australia or offshore.[citation needed]
- The offence of offering Interactive Gambling Services to Australian residents carries a maximum fine of $220,000 per day for individuals within an Interactive Gambling operation or $1.1 million per day for the actual company.[citation needed]
- The responsibility of upholding the IGA is the responsibility of individual gambling operators.[citation needed] The average Australian citizen cannot be punished for signing up and gambling online.[citation needed]
Reasonable diligence
An offence will not be deemed to have been committed if the online gambling operator could not, with due diligence, have known that they were offering their services to residents of Australia. The IGA defines 'reasonable diligence' in the following ways:[citation needed]
- Whether the operator informed potential customers about the law preventing operators offering Interactive Gambling services to Australian residents.
- Whether a customer's contracts with the online gambling operators stated that the customer could not use the service whilst physically present in Australia
- Whether the customers had to provide personal details such as address and whether the customers' details suggested whether they were residents of Australia
Online wagering
There is some leniency in the Interactive Gambling Act that means not all online gambling was prohibited.[citation needed] For example, sports betting through licensed operators is still legal as long as the betting occurs prior to the sporting event starting[6] – this way the individual is not gambling 'interactively'. Online lotteries are also legal according to the Act, as long as they are not the 'instant-win' style scratch cards.[7]
Advertising
The IGA made it an offence to advertise an interactive gambling service or product - the advertising ban extended across all forms of media (from electronic to print).[8]
Complaints
The IGA has a formal complaints process that is managed by the Australian Broadcasting Authority in which people can register any concerns regarding the advertising of Interactive gambling products.
Act review
On 24 August 2011, the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Senator Stephen Conroy, released a discussion paper for the review of the Interactive Gambling Act 2001. The main reasons for reviewing the document are:
- the expansion of online gambling market and the possibility of subsequent growth of problem gambling
- the adequacy of the provisions of the Act to the emerging new technologies
- the necessity to develop an approach to minimisation of negative aspects of online gambling
- the necessity to analyse social, financial and jurisdictional aspects of interactive gambling services in regulated environment
- the necessity to analyse the findings of the Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform inquiry into interactive and online gambling and gambling advertising and the Productivity Commission Inquiry Report on Gambling
Senate Inquiry Into Gambling Advertising Act
The final report has to be presented by the first half of 2012, subject to the Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform reporting by the end of 2011.[9]
References[edit]
- ^Interactive Gambling Act Receives Assent
- ^Interactive Gambling Act 2001: Compilation
- ^Gambling Law
- ^Review of the Interactive Gaming Act 2001
- ^Law comes into effect
- ^Online Gambling in Australia
- ^'The State of Online Play'. Retrieved 8 April 2014.
- ^Loeliger, Jeremy (3 July 2013). 'Advertising and promotion of gambling in sport'. Holding Redlich. Retrieved 8 April 2014.
- ^Terms of reference for the review
Senate Inquiry Into Gambling Advertising Examples
External links[edit]
